This should have been posted on December 21st, but got lost in the Christmas rush.
For its reputed budget of $400 million, there certainly SHOULD be glorious FX. The biggest problem is that the story is awful—not to mention that the dialog is very poor, and there is no chemistry whatsoever between the romantic leads.
Even more disturbing is the critical praise being heaped on this motion picture. Perhaps the most embarrassing gushing came from Roger Ebert, who is rapidly becoming my least favorite movie critic. Check out these direct quotes...
Avatar is not simply a sensational entertainment, although it is that. It's a technical breakthrough. It has a flat-out Green and anti-war message. It is predestined to launch a cult. It contains such visual detailing that it would reward repeating viewings. It invents a new language, Na'vi, as Lord of the Rings did, although mercifully I doubt this one can be spoken by humans, even teenage humans. It creates new movie stars. It is an Event, one of those films you feel you must see to keep up with the conversation.
I've complained that many recent films abandon story telling in their third acts and go for wall-to-wall action. Cameron essentially does that here, but has invested well in establishing his characters so that it matters what they do in battle and how they do it. There are issues at stake greater than simply which side wins.
As to the "Green" message, it is puerile beyond belief. The Na'vi have no technology, yet they are able to live off the land in perfect harmony with nature. Almost nothing is shown regarding how they feed themselves or produce their tools. If Cameron actually believes that the American Indians were Green, and his tale is some sort of retelling of manifest destiny, he is mighty far off the mark. For PC fools like Ebert, though, it's just wonderful.
The movie is about as anti-war as Starship Troopers (1997). Indeed, rather than being anti-war, its third act includes plenty of ultra violence, to satisfy the blood lust of the audience, while stroking its anti-war sentiment.
Did you notice how Ebert tries to excuse Cameron for doing exactly what Ebert would normally condemn in the third act? If he really thinks that the Na'vi characters were well-established, beyond being 9-foot tall blue flower children, I'd sure like to know what I missed. As to new movie stars being created, only Sam Worthington could possibly fit this description, although his perf was not enough to overcome Zoe Saldana's surprisingly weak effort, which was also hampered by the film's worst dialog.
Read my complete review.