No doubt, we've posted numerous articles on glycemic control and type 2 diabetes on this site. This HND piece adds more fuel to the fire.
There's a good reason for my emphasis of this topic. Blood glucose level is easily determined at home with test strips, and given the "trigger" level of 126 milligrams per deciliter, will force compliant patients into immediate pharmaceutical therapy. Never mind that there are potentially serious side effects from these drugs—indeed, several of them have been withdrawn from the market. More than that, the supposed "necessity" of tight glycemic (blood glucose level) control has never been proved. To the contrary, it has been under attack since at least 2000, only you don't hear too much about that.
However, people like Cait O'Sullivan—pharmacy guru and academic detailer (providing objective, balanced, evidence-informed drug information on the best prescribing practices) for the province of British Columbia—have heard about it. O'Sullivan asked the FDA flat-out for proof at a recent seminar, and they simply shut her down.
We discovered some very interesting articles questioning the orthodoxy on glycemic control, and present them for your perusal.
Read the complete article.